Science Junkie
Why Are We Still Shouting About GMOs?

Why is it so hard for scientists and the public to agree about the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture? Proponents argue that tweaking a crop’s DNA can increase nutritional value, pest resistance, or yield to help feed the world’s growing population. But many remain vehemently opposed to the technology. Some fear that big businesses like Monsanto will monopolize the agricultural industry by claiming intellectual property rights over GM crops. Others aren’t convinced that GMOs are safe to eat.
Philosopher of science Daniel Hicks of Western University in London, Canada, has studied how sociopolitical and ethical concerns—for example, fears about abuse of intellectual property rights—get mixed up with the technical questions about food safety in the GMO debate. His current research seeks to document how people on either side of the controversy collect and use evidence about the claim that GMOs increase crop yields. He presented a poster titled “Why is the GMO debate so intractable?” here at the annual meeting of AAAS, which publishes Science. Hicks sat down with Science to answer a few questions about the GMO debate. 
Read more (via sciencemag.org)

Who is interested to dig deeper into the issue, I suggest the special that Nature did in 2013 for the thirty years since the introduction of the first transgenic plant.

Why Are We Still Shouting About GMOs?

Why is it so hard for scientists and the public to agree about the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture? Proponents argue that tweaking a crop’s DNA can increase nutritional value, pest resistance, or yield to help feed the world’s growing population. But many remain vehemently opposed to the technology. Some fear that big businesses like Monsanto will monopolize the agricultural industry by claiming intellectual property rights over GM crops. Others aren’t convinced that GMOs are safe to eat.

Philosopher of science Daniel Hicks of Western University in London, Canada, has studied how sociopolitical and ethical concerns—for example, fears about abuse of intellectual property rights—get mixed up with the technical questions about food safety in the GMO debate. His current research seeks to document how people on either side of the controversy collect and use evidence about the claim that GMOs increase crop yields. He presented a poster titled “Why is the GMO debate so intractable?” here at the annual meeting of AAAS, which publishes Science. Hicks sat down with Science to answer a few questions about the GMO debate. 

Read more (via sciencemag.org)

Who is interested to dig deeper into the issue, I suggest the special that Nature did in 2013 for the thirty years since the introduction of the first transgenic plant.







  1. gmocriticalthinking reblogged this from science-junkie
  2. alwayssmile420 reblogged this from science-junkie
  3. simplicityandstrawberries reblogged this from science-junkie
  4. maggie-modified reblogged this from science-junkie
  5. meberuk reblogged this from science-junkie
  6. theexemplar reblogged this from science-junkie
  7. porcupine-girl reblogged this from mypocketshurt90
  8. mercyisforthecoyote reblogged this from mypocketshurt90
  9. mypocketshurt90 reblogged this from supervaca
  10. artiste9999 reblogged this from science-junkie
  11. supervaca reblogged this from science-junkie
  12. multiverseofawesomeness reblogged this from science-junkie
  13. ellphia reblogged this from science-junkie
  14. salvacorpusamanti reblogged this from science-junkie
  15. apocalypticdictatorship reblogged this from sciencesosexy
  16. smktty reblogged this from sliverdemon
  17. chinesecontradiction reblogged this from science-junkie
  18. teacherlp reblogged this from science-junkie
  19. youre-about-to-bloom reblogged this from science-junkie
  20. inspirationallyinspirational reblogged this from science-junkie
  21. particularlygoodtaste reblogged this from roddaxios
  22. tazbird69 reblogged this from science-junkie
  23. roshi-no-tabi reblogged this from sliverdemon
  24. sliverdemon reblogged this from maneatingbadger
  25. pinkchaoscat reblogged this from science-junkie
  26. i-want-a-dreamatorium reblogged this from science-junkie