Science Junkie
Physicists Debate Whether the World Is Made of Particles or Fields or Something Else Entirely
Physicists speak of the world as being made of particles and force fields, but it is not at all clear what particles and force fields actually are in the quantum realm. The world may instead consist of bundles of properties, such as color and shape.
Physicists routinely describe the universe as being made of tiny subatomic particles that push and pull on one another by means of force fields. They call their subject “particle physics” and their instruments “particle accelerators.” They hew to a Lego-like model of the world. But this view sweeps a little-known fact under the rug: the particle interpretation of quantum physics, as well as the field interpretation, stretches our conventional notions of “particle” and “field” to such an extent that ever more people think the world might be made of something else entirely.
The problem is not that physicists lack a valid theory of the subatomic realm. They do have one: it is called quantum field theory. Theorists developed it between the late 1920s and early 1950s by merging the earlier theory of quantum mechanics with Einstein’s special theory of relativity. Quantum field theory provides the conceptual underpinnings of the Standard Model of particle physics, which describes the fundamental building blocks of matter and their interactions in one common framework. In terms of empirical precision, it is the most successful theory in the history of science. Physicists use it every day to calculate the aftermath of particle collisions, the synthesis of matter in the big bang, the extreme conditions inside atomic nuclei, and much besides.
Source: sciam.com

Physicists Debate Whether the World Is Made of Particles or Fields or Something Else Entirely

Physicists speak of the world as being made of particles and force fields, but it is not at all clear what particles and force fields actually are in the quantum realm. The world may instead consist of bundles of properties, such as color and shape.

Physicists routinely describe the universe as being made of tiny subatomic particles that push and pull on one another by means of force fields. They call their subject “particle physics” and their instruments “particle accelerators.” They hew to a Lego-like model of the world. But this view sweeps a little-known fact under the rug: the particle interpretation of quantum physics, as well as the field interpretation, stretches our conventional notions of “particle” and “field” to such an extent that ever more people think the world might be made of something else entirely.

The problem is not that physicists lack a valid theory of the subatomic realm. They do have one: it is called quantum field theory. Theorists developed it between the late 1920s and early 1950s by merging the earlier theory of quantum mechanics with Einstein’s special theory of relativity. Quantum field theory provides the conceptual underpinnings of the Standard Model of particle physics, which describes the fundamental building blocks of matter and their interactions in one common framework. In terms of empirical precision, it is the most successful theory in the history of science. Physicists use it every day to calculate the aftermath of particle collisions, the synthesis of matter in the big bang, the extreme conditions inside atomic nuclei, and much besides.

Source: sciam.com







  1. thinkparadox reblogged this from science-junkie
  2. makemeyourshiningstar reblogged this from multiverseofawesomeness
  3. multiverseofawesomeness reblogged this from science-junkie
  4. soulfucker69 reblogged this from science-junkie
  5. geminidoomed reblogged this from holydestruction
  6. holydestruction reblogged this from science-junkie
  7. satanicsaiyan420 reblogged this from science-junkie
  8. komikbookgeek reblogged this from science-junkie
  9. sillage-and-tea reblogged this from science-junkie
  10. olegsphi reblogged this from science-junkie
  11. scousery1989 reblogged this from science-junkie
  12. coldsmog reblogged this from science-junkie
  13. energyinfoperceptionquestion reblogged this from science-junkie
  14. starkageddon reblogged this from photograspider
  15. leonerdnimoy reblogged this from science-junkie
  16. fuckyeahholasoydarks reblogged this from science-junkie
  17. lavandulum reblogged this from somuchscience
  18. gooftroopin reblogged this from somuchscience
  19. short-skirts-and-garterbelts reblogged this from somuchscience
  20. somuchscience reblogged this from science-junkie
  21. lyvers reblogged this from science-junkie
  22. relker reblogged this from science-junkie
  23. rinzler06 reblogged this from science-junkie
  24. photograspider reblogged this from indestructibleandangry