NASA’s cold fusion tech could put a nuclear reactor in every home, car, and plane.

When we think of nuclear power, there are usually just two options: fission and fusion. Fission, which creates huge amounts of heat by splitting larger atoms into smaller atoms, is what currently powers every nuclear reactor on Earth. Fusion is the opposite, creating vast amounts of energy by fusing atoms of hydrogen together, but we’re still many years away from large-scale, commercial fusion reactors.

A nickel lattice soaking up hydrogen ions in a LENR reactorLENR is absolutely nothing like either fission or fusion. Where fission and fusion are underpinned by strong nuclear force, LENR harnesses power from weak nuclear force — but capturing this energy is difficult. So far, NASA’s best effort involves a nickel lattice and hydrogen ions. The hydrogen ions are sucked into the nickel lattice, and then the lattice is oscillated at a very high frequency (between 5 and 30 terahertz). This oscillation excites the nickel’s electrons, which are forced into the hydrogen ions (protons), forming slow-moving neutrons. The nickel immediately absorbs these neutrons, making it unstable. To regain its stability, the nickel strips a neutron of its electron so that it becomes a proton — a reaction that turns the nickel into copper and creates a lot of energy in the process.[…]

So why don’t we have LENR reactors yet? Just like fusion, it is proving hard to build a LENR system that produces more energy than the energy required to begin the reaction. In this case, NASA says that the 5-30THz frequency required to oscillate the nickel lattice is hard to efficiently produce. As we’ve reported over the last couple of years, though, strong advances are being made in the generation and control of terahertz radiation. Other labs outside of NASA are working on cold fusion and LENR, too: “Several labs have blown up studying LENR and windows have melted,” says NASA scientist Dennis Bushnell, proving that “when the conditions are ‘right’ prodigious amounts of energy can be produced and released.”

Source: extremetech.com

Posted on February 23, 2013

Source: extremetech.com

Notes: 956 notes

Tags: science,tech,physics,NASA,nuclear power,energy,


Notes

  1. designationbeast reblogged this from science-junkie
  2. mynuclearlife reblogged this from nuclearamerica
  3. texturesofether reblogged this from shoorai and added:
    a nuclear reactor
  4. giantboombastic reblogged this from science-junkie
  5. imphill reblogged this from science-junkie and added:
    Huh… Maybe things won’t be so bad in the future eh?
  6. made-of-nguyen reblogged this from transhumanisticpanspermia
  7. pathien reblogged this from science-junkie
  8. schizo-fractured reblogged this from transhumanisticpanspermia
  9. himynameisnickolas reblogged this from gloriatraveler
  10. gloriatraveler reblogged this from transhumanisticpanspermia
  11. knightofash reblogged this from transhumanisticpanspermia and added:
    Terminology aside, this looks like a fun garage project to attempt. Unless you can actually make a working model and...
  12. transhumanisticpanspermia reblogged this from paradoxicalparadigms and added:
    Besides the fact that this is the shittiest explanation of weak force reactions ever (“the nickel strips a neutron of...
  13. startend reblogged this from nea-so-copros
  14. nea-so-copros reblogged this from paradoxicalparadigms
  15. quantuminsanity reblogged this from paradoxicalparadigms
  16. saggy-sal reblogged this from paradoxicalparadigms
  17. paradoxicalparadigms reblogged this from infinitecosmos
  18. infinitecosmos reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  19. adi0s-t0read0r reblogged this from science-junkie
  20. frolickermonkey reblogged this from science-junkie
  21. monkeypawkindofthing reblogged this from science-junkie
  22. peculiaraura reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  23. melodynightmare reblogged this from science-junkie
  24. chasingsunsacrossacircularpath reblogged this from science-junkie
Top of Page